Unifying .NET - One framework to rule them all?

.NET 5 is on the way and scheduled to be delivered in November 2020. It is meant to unify .NET Framework, .NET Core, Mono (and possibly .NET Standard) - i.e. the entire .NET Platform.

After 17 years of working in .NET (since it was first released in 2002), I'm excited to see a unified solution to the splintered framework that .NET has become as of late.  IMO, .NET Framework, .NET Core, .NET Standard, and Mono have grown into a big bad monster that is growing faster than its parts can manage. While we know (and expect) technology to evolve and grow over time, we hope that it doesn't fragment and splinter so much that its parts become dissimilar.  I've seen it grow from a set of APIs that were questionable to something that is almost overwhelming - and certainly difficult to keep up with.  I'm pleased to see that Microsoft has acknowledged the splintering and has been working on a solution since at least December 2018.  I'm looking forward to seeing how much simpler things will become.

https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/introducing-net-5/

Now if they could just FINALLY fix "Edit and Continue"...........

(image is copyright of Microsoft)

Missing Start Page from Visual Studio 2019

Oh Microsoft, why hast thou forsaken the beloved 'Start Page' and replaced it with a modal window?

The new 'Start Window' which replaces the 'Start Page'

You can see the design reasoning behind the new VS 2019 Start Window as posted at 'Get to code: How we designed the new Visual Studio start window' and 'New Start Window and New Project Dialog Experience in Visual Studio 2019'.

I sincerely appreciate any amount of thought, consideration, or testing that a company decides to invest in their products - especially a flagship produce like Visual Studio.  Based on the design reasoning Microsoft certainly had good intentions and did put a good amount of thought and testing into the effort.  However, I think they missed the mark.  Perform any Google search on "missing start page visual studio 2019" or look on the Developer Community Feedback Site and you'll see devs crying out for the beloved Start Page.

Some things are better left untouched and left alone and the Start Page is one of them. Some might argue the new 'Start Window' is a better experience but why make it a modal window?  Really?  In Visual Studio 2019 Preview 1, at least the option to restore the 'Start Page' was available as an option in the Startup settings:

However, somewhere along the way the 'Start Page' item has disappeared from the drop-down...headsmack!  Here's what the options are in version 16.0.2:

Ok, now I'm getting frustrated.  I get it. You're trying to funnel me into this new window that you think is better.  Well, my response is

Fortunately, Microsoft hasn't completely done away with the 'Start Page'...yet.  You can still add it by customizing the toolbar to add the Start Page button:

1. Right-click the toolbar and select 'Customize':

2. Select the 'Commands' tab:

3. Select 'Toolbar' and change the dropdown to whatever menu you'd like, then click the 'Add Command' button:

4. Choose 'File' from the Categories list box, then select 'Start Page' from the Commands list box:

So, there you go!  At least it's still there for now.  I'd bet any amount of money that they change the experience back so that either the 'Start Page' option is available from the Environment/Startup setting. To be fair, Microsoft has improved significantly at listening to community feedback.

Angular2 and TypeScript

This is awesome for the Client side scripting world! I LOVE both of the languages and the features and safety of each.  Great collaboration!

Http://techcrunch.com/2015/03/05/microsoft-and-google-collaborate-on-typescript-hell-has-not-frozen-over-yet/

HTTP 2 is finally done

Finally the specs for HTTP 2 were finalized yesterday and will be integrated into Chrome 40 and a new FireFox coming over the next 10-12 weeks.  Here are some of the things to expect.

http://thenextweb.com/insider/2015/02/18/http2-first-major-update-http-sixteen-years-finalized/

https://www.mnot.net/blog/2014/01/30/http2_expectations

http://gizmodo.com/what-is-http-2-1686537168

How not to do Dependency Injection

Dependency Injection (DI) is not a new concept and has been discussed, blogged, and published many times.  There are a huge number of books out there on the subject.  I've seen many usages and implementations of it used by various clients I've consulted for. 

Like the author of the blog post I refer to below, one of the most common and mis-used, abuses of, and antipatterns I've seen is the wrapping of the DI model in a static container.








I recently found an excellent article that explains in great detail why this is a bad idea and a big anti-pattern - http://www.devtrends.co.uk/blog/how-not-to-do-dependency-injection-the-static-or-singleton-container.

Hopefully, this will help improve your understanding of what DI is and how it should not be used.